Skip to main content

Work From Home towards Cost-Saving



COVID-19 outbreak has made the employees, the employers and the governments to re-think about Work From Home. WFH is not a brand new concept. It was introduced a few decades back. In the 1980s with the birth of the Internet, this concept came into practice. Many companies used this concept from time to time. Starting from large companies like Yahoo this was used by the many small to large scale companies. But they didn’t continue with this concept. Some companies used mixed methods like using both WFH home and working on-site practices.

Is this concept practical enough?

Yes, with the advancement of technology, collaboration, work progress tracking, activity monitoring, conferencing tools and methodologies were implemented. So this concept is 100% practical.
But there are some issues too. Unplugging from work is the issue faced by most remote workers. Apart from that lacking person to person communication, security were some other concerns.

Sri Lankan Context of WFH

In Sri Lanka, the WFH concept was not widely used since the COVID-19 outbreak. This was mostly used by few Sri Lankan IT companies. And the government never promoted this concept. But with the sudden COVID-19 outbreak, as a practice of social distancing government wanted to promote WFH. But the Sri Lankan companies, employees were not ready enough. Most of the people were not aware of this concept. But some private sector institutions successfully carried out their work using this concept. Most of the IT companies and the IT Departments of the Sri Lankan companies were using this methodology. But as soon as the lockdown was lifted some companies reverted to normal while few companies kept practising the same. Almost all the companies which tried out this concept proved that this concept is feasible for our country as well. As an impact of COVID19, almost all the companies are working towards reducing their operational cost. But how many of them thought of using WFH for reducing their operational costs?

Tharindu Rajapaksha MBCS | CNSS (ICSI - UK) 
MBA- UK
thathsarana05@gmail.com
+9470 130 8868

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Different Styles of Human Resource Management

Human Resource Management Styles differ from a company to another. But when it comes to a certain region the HRM practices of that region are almost the same. There could be slight differences. As an example the American Style of HRM & the Japanese Style of HRM is totally different. When it comes to the Japanese Practices of HRM; The core of the Japanese HRM depends on job security   (Moriguchi, 2014) . Consultative decision-making practices, higher frequency of communication, lifetime employment, long-term planning horizons, generalist career paths, quality control circles and etc. America doesn't have strict regulations when compared to Japan labour employment conditions in Japan are very much regulated and controlled by the government. This is due in part to the fact that Japan is one of the most uncertainty avoiding countries. They dislike uncertainty and everything must be in good control without any uncertain occurring. As such, this is the need for many

Ethical context of HRM

  Ethics are standards of right and wrong, good and bad. Ethics are concerned with what one ought to do to fulfil one’s moral duty. Ethics , also called  moral philosophy , the  discipline  concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong. (Singer, 2019) Ethics in HRM indicates the treatment of employees with ordinary decency and distributive justice. The ethical business contributed to the business goals as the employees will feel motivated and they will work with efficiency and effectiveness. Ethics in HRM basically deals with the affirmative moral obligations of the employer towards the employees to maintain equality and equity justice. ‘All HR practices have an ethical foundation. HR deals with the practical consequences of human behaviour’.(Johnson, 2003, cited in Rosa,2007) ‘The entire concept of HRM is devoid of morality.’ (Hart, 1993: 29, cited in Rosa, 2007) Against this background, management style and management ideology have undergone great